Greetings fellow students and bloggers,

This is the first blog I've ever created and I'm both happy and relieved to report it was not as bad as I thought it was going to be. When asked to do something that you've never done before and don't even know where to start, the initial reaction for some people (like myself) can often be a mix of panic and anxiety. haha
Someone once said "The thing you don't want to learn is probably the thing you need to learn the most". When I start to feel like I can't do something before I even start I remember these words. To be honest, the idea of posting my thoughts and opinions in such an open, interactive format made me nervous but I'm intrigued by what I will learn along the way from myself, my classmates, and anyone who reads my blog.

I do not consider myself a writer, so please be gentle with the comments on my posts. Remember...it's all about learning. :-)

Stay tuned for my posts and updates.

Bye for now,

Tara Jones

Saturday, January 28, 2012

BLOG #2 - The "Ratchet Effect" and Food

Since I’ve started this class and created this blog, I realize I’m reading and looking at things differently and trying to relate it to what I’ve learned in Tomasello’s book. I’m always thinking to myself, “This could be my next blog topic!”  I’m sure many of you can relate to my new found inquisitive nature.

I’m enjoying the process of reflecting on what I’ve learned in my life up to this point, what I continue to learn everyday, and the different learning environments I find myself emerged in pulling me in different directions about what I want to write about. This week I’ve had the opportunity to spend some time with my extended family in Ontario. Sometimes when an event in life brings a family close together you find yourself reminiscing about the past through shared stories and pictures. When my cousins and I were looking at old family pictures we found ourselves comparing the old floor model TV’s to our sleek flat screens, the polaroid cameras with our digital cameras and smartphones, Atari vs. Wii and Xbox, and the list goes on. While everyone else was laughing I was thinking to myself I just found my next blog topic!  All of these cultural artifacts and tools have been modified by individuals and groups from one generation to the next resulting in more elaborate and complex cultural artifacts and tools. Tomasello refers to this process as cumulative cultural evolution through the “ratchet effect”.

Tomasello (1999) explains this “ratchet effect” in more detail in the first chapter of his book:  

Some individual or group of individuals first invented a primitive version of the artifact or practice, and then some later user or users made a modification, an “improvement”, that others then adopted perhaps without change for many generations, at which point some other individual or group of individuals made another modification, which was then learned and used by others, and so on over historical time. (p. 5)

The modern advances in technology, medicine, communication, food production, etc. are all examples of the ratchet effect. In the definition, I don’t necessarily agree with Tomasello’s use of the word “improvement”.  Some of the advances in our human culture might have improved cultural practices or artifacts in terms of things like efficiency, communication, reduced-cost, accessibility, etc. but there have also been some detrimental consequences to our physical and social environments and in some cases, to our health. For example, let’s take a look at how our food has changed over the last 100 years. 

Our food is continually evolving to meet the needs of consumer demands in an ever-changing, fast-paced society. As our lives become more hectic, the underlying theme is that there is less time available for preparing and cooking meals. This has resulted in a multi-billion dollar industry of convenience foods, such as fast food and ready-to-eat pre-packaged foods.  This might be considered an “improvement” as the food industry is coming up with innovative technologies to produce these foods meeting consumer demands but the overconsumption of these foods is negatively impacting our environment and contributing to the growing rates of diseases in our country. It is now culturally acceptable and justifiable for many people to rely heavily on these convenience foods because there is no time in our busy schedules to prepare nutritious meals and the cost of healthy food is expensive. The problem is that these foods that are supposed to make our lives easier can shorten our lifespan as they are often higher in fat, sodium, and calories, thus increasing our risk of many chronic diseases such as heart disease and diabetes. Unfortunately, it is not uncommon for people to rely exclusively on convenience foods to feed their families. If children grow up eating these foods and don’t learn from their parents about healthy eating and how to prepare meals, as adults they will lack a necessary life skill to prepare nutritious food for themselves and their families. More importantly, over the last few years it is becoming common knowledge that as a result of childhood obesity this is the first time in history parents will outlive their children.   

Some of my best childhood memories were pulling up a chair to help my grandmother and mother in the kitchen. What kind of learning opportunities and memories are children in today’s society missing out on? With respect to the “ratchet effect” on food, I worry what the future holds as I see young children with Type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol. It’s not just about the choices we make, it’s about the evolution of food production and how it affects the food we put into our bodies. With the steady rise in diseases, the ratchet effect is seen in advances in modern medicine to help us fight these diseases. It seems like a vicious cycle. When does it end? Will food production practices continue to reduce the quality of our food to meet consumer demands? As a society, we will continue to move away from our traditional cultural practices of preparing our own meals and rely more on convenience foods? And, will obesity continue to affect the lifespan of future generations?
 
Some food for thought………..
Jaime Oliver's  Processed Food Reality Check


References
Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.



Friday, January 20, 2012

Formatting

Ok....so I'm trying to learn how to format things on this blog. It will look perfect and than I publish the post and the words and pictures are all out of whack. It will get better as I go. Sorry! haha

BLOG #1 - Impaired Cognitive Development in Severely Neglected Childen

In Tomasello’s book, “The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition”, we learn that all species are designed to function within a particular environment. More specifically, human infants and young children require exposure to a particular kind of social environment or culture to support their social and cognitive development. Parents need to raise their children in a nurturing environment in order to facilitate their cultural learning. Human infants and young children are born completely dependent on their parents. A child’s experiences will be based solely on the practices of the family they are born into.
Tomasello (1999) looks at the way in which these human cultural environments shape our children’s cognitive development:

       The particular habitus into which a child is born determines the kinds of social innteractions she will have, the kinds of physical objects she will have available, the kinds of learning experiences and opportunities she will encounter, and the kinds of inferences she will draw about the way of life of those around her. The habitus thus has direct effects on cognitive development in terms of the “raw material” with which the child has to work. (p.79)

This concept led me to think about the children who are deprived of these “raw materials” and not raised in a nurturing environment conducive to their cultural learning. I was curious to learn more about the severe cases if neglect seen in feral or isolated children. I was baffled that these children could survive in such horrific conditions and in disbelief that their own parents were the ones who not only denied their own babies the basic necessities of life but the love and affection every child deserves. What impact did this social isolation have on their cognitive development and what was their capacity for learning after they were found and introduced to a world they have not had the opportunity to learn from?

During my research, I came across a very interesting concept proposed by Eric Lenneberg (1967) called the “Critical Period Hypothesis”. This hypothesis states “there are maturational constraints on the time a first language can be acquired. First language acquisition relies on neuroplasticity. If language acquisition does not occur by puberty (around age 12), some aspects of language can be learnt but full mastery cannot be achieved” (p. 180).  Because this hypothesis cannot be ethically tested on humans and animals lack the capacity to acquire language, cases of feral or isolated children have been studied to support or refute this hypothesis

I would like to introduce you to two of the most well-known and documented cases of feral/isolated children.                                                   
GENIE
Genie was born Susan Wiley in Arcadia, California in 1957. Her father suffering from depression decided that she was retarded. He felt he needed to “protect” her from the outside world so he kept her locked up in a dark room strapped to a potty chair until for most of her life. She was discovered at the age of 13 in diapers barely able to walk or talk, and unable to chew or swallow food.   She was found to have a vocabulary of about 20 words, most of which were negative, leading scientists to believe she was abused for making noise but despite making some progress in acquiring some new words she was never able to function as a “normal” adult.                                                     
Genie and her mother at her foster home in California in 1989
       
     Video: "Secret of the Wild Child" Part 1 
           

                                                                                                                                                                                             

DANI
Dani was born Danielle Crockett in 1998 and lived with her mother in Florida. Despite numerous attempts from neighbours calling the child abuse hotline to report about the “The Girl in the Window” who has never been seen              outside     of her home, it took three years before a case worker and police officer came to the house. In July of 2005, Danielle was found locked in a filthy, roach infested room curled up on a soiled mattress in an overflowing diaper, her body full of insect bites and sores. She was severely malnourished, unable to speak or make eye contact, and was found to have the mental and physical capacities of an infant. Danielle was taken to hospital and put in foster care and adopted by a loving family 2 years later. Her new adoptive family called her Dani. With an incredible amount of love and support from her family and workers she continues to show progress. While it has been reported that Danielle will never be a “normal child” she is now responsive to affection, riding horses, swimming, walking, communicating with non-verbal cues, and doing Pre-K work in school.
Article printed in 2005 when she was discovered:       
                                            “The Girl in the Window” You tube video
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  

 
 
 
Dani with her new adoptive parents, Bernie and Diane Lierow, and her stepbrother, William 

This is a recent picture of Dani in her new home.
Check out Dani's Blog to see the progress she has made:
While it is unclear the extent to which their abusive upbringing might have contributed to their severely impaired cognitive function, I still think these cases support the “critical period hypothesis” through their inability to learn the language skills considered “normal” for their age group. Aside from their ability to learn language, I found it very interesting to compare their overall progress based on their environments they were exposed to after they were found. I think Dani’s adoption into a loving, supportive, and culturally rich learning environment definitely contributed to her progress while Genie was the object of experiments for years and lived in adult foster homes. Genie was making some
progress but her environment caused her to regress again when she was abused in one of the foster homes and she never found her way back. It is amazing to see the progress Dani is making and I will continue beyond this post to stay tuned into her own blog site I posted earlier.
References
Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley.